Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject German Studies - Semiotics, Pragmatics, Semantics, grade: 1.0, University of Hannover, language: English, abstract: The study of language change has evolved at a high rate throughout the last century.

Significant insights have been gained concerning the workings of the human mind and,

by extension, the workings of semantic and linguistic change. Set in comparison and

contrast, however, it becomes obvious that some convictions have remained stable and

still play a role as prominent as they did in the year of 1880. It can even be argued that

most of the accomplishments of todays language change researchers strongly build on

those of the last century and could not have been achieved without them. To illustrate

this assumption, the present termpaper compares two works on language change that

were written in two different centuries in two different countries; Prinzipien der

Sprachgeschichte (Chapter 4: Wandel der Wortbedeutung) written by Hermann Paul in

1880 and Semantic Change and Cognition written by Gábor Györi in 2002. Hermann

Paul was a German linguist and lexicographer, who was born on August 7 in 1846 and

passed away on December 29 in 1921. He was a significant representative of the

Neogrammarian school of thought. The cognitive linguist Gábor Györi is associate

professor and head of the department of English linguistics at the University of Pécs,

Hungary and has a strong focus on the evolution of cognition and categorization.

It shall furthermore be shown that Pauls work shares many of the tenets of

modern cognitive linguistics even though that might not be obvious at the first glance,

due to differences in terminology and methodology.

In order to filter out similarities and differences between both the authors points

of view, chapter 1.1 will briefly summarize the contents of Pauls text, while chapter 1.2

will give an account of the most important tenets of Györis work. In chapter 2.1, the

terminology Paul and Györi used will be explained and contrasted. Chapter 2.2 then

deals with the contentual comparison of both texts. Here the focus will be set on the role that the authors assign to metaphor and metonymy as mechanisms of semantic change.

In chapter 2.3, it will be analyzed, which notion of language is manifested in the

respective works.